Review



human tlr2 elisa kit  (Cusabio)


Bioz Verified Symbol Cusabio is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cusabio manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 93

    Structured Review

    Cusabio human tlr2 elisa kit
    Human Tlr2 Elisa Kit, supplied by Cusabio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 5 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human tlr2 elisa kit/product/Cusabio
    Average 93 stars, based on 5 article reviews
    human tlr2 elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    94
    Shanghai Korain Biotech Co Ltd tlr4
    Evaluation of the <t>TLR2-TLR4</t> signaling pathway in HCT-116 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO (1 μL/mL), SsnB (25 μM), and/or PMA (10 nM) for 12 h in all experiments. Images were acquired with a 40× objective. ( A ) PCR analysis of TLR2. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.05 vs. SsnB. ( B ) PCR analysis of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.01 vs. SsnB. ( C ) Protein levels of Toll-like Receptor 2 (TLR2). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( D ) Protein levels of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( E ) Myeloid differentiation primary response protein (MyD88), phospho-ERK, and phospho-NF-kB were immunofluorescence stained in HCT-116 cells. ( F ) MyD88 fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001, vs. all other groups. **, p < 0.001, vs. control and DMSO groups. ( G ) Protein levels of MyD88. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( H ) Phospho-ERK fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.01, vs. all other groups. ( I ) Phospho-NF-kB fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( J ) Protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. control, DMSO, and SsnB. ( K ) Protein levels of interleukin 1Β (IL-1B). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. all other groups. ( L ) Protein levels of IL-6. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups.
    Tlr4, supplied by Shanghai Korain Biotech Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/tlr4/product/Shanghai Korain Biotech Co Ltd
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tlr4 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Miltenyi Biotec toll like receptor 9 agonist tlr 9a
    Evaluation of the <t>TLR2-TLR4</t> signaling pathway in HCT-116 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO (1 μL/mL), SsnB (25 μM), and/or PMA (10 nM) for 12 h in all experiments. Images were acquired with a 40× objective. ( A ) PCR analysis of TLR2. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.05 vs. SsnB. ( B ) PCR analysis of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.01 vs. SsnB. ( C ) Protein levels of Toll-like Receptor 2 (TLR2). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( D ) Protein levels of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( E ) Myeloid differentiation primary response protein (MyD88), phospho-ERK, and phospho-NF-kB were immunofluorescence stained in HCT-116 cells. ( F ) MyD88 fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001, vs. all other groups. **, p < 0.001, vs. control and DMSO groups. ( G ) Protein levels of MyD88. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( H ) Phospho-ERK fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.01, vs. all other groups. ( I ) Phospho-NF-kB fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( J ) Protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. control, DMSO, and SsnB. ( K ) Protein levels of interleukin 1Β (IL-1B). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. all other groups. ( L ) Protein levels of IL-6. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups.
    Toll Like Receptor 9 Agonist Tlr 9a, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/toll like receptor 9 agonist tlr 9a/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    toll like receptor 9 agonist tlr 9a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Cusabio human tlr2 elisa kit
    Evaluation of the <t>TLR2-TLR4</t> signaling pathway in HCT-116 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO (1 μL/mL), SsnB (25 μM), and/or PMA (10 nM) for 12 h in all experiments. Images were acquired with a 40× objective. ( A ) PCR analysis of TLR2. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.05 vs. SsnB. ( B ) PCR analysis of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.01 vs. SsnB. ( C ) Protein levels of Toll-like Receptor 2 (TLR2). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( D ) Protein levels of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( E ) Myeloid differentiation primary response protein (MyD88), phospho-ERK, and phospho-NF-kB were immunofluorescence stained in HCT-116 cells. ( F ) MyD88 fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001, vs. all other groups. **, p < 0.001, vs. control and DMSO groups. ( G ) Protein levels of MyD88. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( H ) Phospho-ERK fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.01, vs. all other groups. ( I ) Phospho-NF-kB fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( J ) Protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. control, DMSO, and SsnB. ( K ) Protein levels of interleukin 1Β (IL-1B). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. all other groups. ( L ) Protein levels of IL-6. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups.
    Human Tlr2 Elisa Kit, supplied by Cusabio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human tlr2 elisa kit/product/Cusabio
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human tlr2 elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    MyBiosource Biotechnology human toll-like receptor 9 elisa kit
    Evaluation of the <t>TLR2-TLR4</t> signaling pathway in HCT-116 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO (1 μL/mL), SsnB (25 μM), and/or PMA (10 nM) for 12 h in all experiments. Images were acquired with a 40× objective. ( A ) PCR analysis of TLR2. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.05 vs. SsnB. ( B ) PCR analysis of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.01 vs. SsnB. ( C ) Protein levels of Toll-like Receptor 2 (TLR2). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( D ) Protein levels of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( E ) Myeloid differentiation primary response protein (MyD88), phospho-ERK, and phospho-NF-kB were immunofluorescence stained in HCT-116 cells. ( F ) MyD88 fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001, vs. all other groups. **, p < 0.001, vs. control and DMSO groups. ( G ) Protein levels of MyD88. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( H ) Phospho-ERK fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.01, vs. all other groups. ( I ) Phospho-NF-kB fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( J ) Protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. control, DMSO, and SsnB. ( K ) Protein levels of interleukin 1Β (IL-1B). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. all other groups. ( L ) Protein levels of IL-6. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups.
    Human Toll Like Receptor 9 Elisa Kit, supplied by MyBiosource Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human toll-like receptor 9 elisa kit/product/MyBiosource Biotechnology
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human toll-like receptor 9 elisa kit - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Boster Bio receptor 4 buffer
    Evaluation of the <t>TLR2-TLR4</t> signaling pathway in HCT-116 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO (1 μL/mL), SsnB (25 μM), and/or PMA (10 nM) for 12 h in all experiments. Images were acquired with a 40× objective. ( A ) PCR analysis of TLR2. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.05 vs. SsnB. ( B ) PCR analysis of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.01 vs. SsnB. ( C ) Protein levels of Toll-like Receptor 2 (TLR2). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( D ) Protein levels of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( E ) Myeloid differentiation primary response protein (MyD88), phospho-ERK, and phospho-NF-kB were immunofluorescence stained in HCT-116 cells. ( F ) MyD88 fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001, vs. all other groups. **, p < 0.001, vs. control and DMSO groups. ( G ) Protein levels of MyD88. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( H ) Phospho-ERK fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.01, vs. all other groups. ( I ) Phospho-NF-kB fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( J ) Protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. control, DMSO, and SsnB. ( K ) Protein levels of interleukin 1Β (IL-1B). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. all other groups. ( L ) Protein levels of IL-6. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups.
    Receptor 4 Buffer, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/receptor 4 buffer/product/Boster Bio
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    receptor 4 buffer - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Boster Bio nitric oxide pamps recognizing pathogen
    Evaluation of the <t>TLR2-TLR4</t> signaling pathway in HCT-116 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO (1 μL/mL), SsnB (25 μM), and/or PMA (10 nM) for 12 h in all experiments. Images were acquired with a 40× objective. ( A ) PCR analysis of TLR2. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.05 vs. SsnB. ( B ) PCR analysis of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.01 vs. SsnB. ( C ) Protein levels of Toll-like Receptor 2 (TLR2). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( D ) Protein levels of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( E ) Myeloid differentiation primary response protein (MyD88), phospho-ERK, and phospho-NF-kB were immunofluorescence stained in HCT-116 cells. ( F ) MyD88 fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001, vs. all other groups. **, p < 0.001, vs. control and DMSO groups. ( G ) Protein levels of MyD88. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( H ) Phospho-ERK fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.01, vs. all other groups. ( I ) Phospho-NF-kB fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( J ) Protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. control, DMSO, and SsnB. ( K ) Protein levels of interleukin 1Β (IL-1B). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. all other groups. ( L ) Protein levels of IL-6. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups.
    Nitric Oxide Pamps Recognizing Pathogen, supplied by Boster Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/nitric oxide pamps recognizing pathogen/product/Boster Bio
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    nitric oxide pamps recognizing pathogen - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Thermo Fisher anti-human toll-like receptor (tlr2) monoclonal antibody
    Evaluation of the <t>TLR2-TLR4</t> signaling pathway in HCT-116 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO (1 μL/mL), SsnB (25 μM), and/or PMA (10 nM) for 12 h in all experiments. Images were acquired with a 40× objective. ( A ) PCR analysis of TLR2. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.05 vs. SsnB. ( B ) PCR analysis of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.01 vs. SsnB. ( C ) Protein levels of Toll-like Receptor 2 (TLR2). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( D ) Protein levels of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( E ) Myeloid differentiation primary response protein (MyD88), phospho-ERK, and phospho-NF-kB were immunofluorescence stained in HCT-116 cells. ( F ) MyD88 fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001, vs. all other groups. **, p < 0.001, vs. control and DMSO groups. ( G ) Protein levels of MyD88. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( H ) Phospho-ERK fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.01, vs. all other groups. ( I ) Phospho-NF-kB fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( J ) Protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. control, DMSO, and SsnB. ( K ) Protein levels of interleukin 1Β (IL-1B). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. all other groups. ( L ) Protein levels of IL-6. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups.
    Anti Human Toll Like Receptor (Tlr2) Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti-human toll-like receptor (tlr2) monoclonal antibody/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti-human toll-like receptor (tlr2) monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Miltenyi Biotec toll like receptor tlr stimulus independent way
    Evaluation of the <t>TLR2-TLR4</t> signaling pathway in HCT-116 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO (1 μL/mL), SsnB (25 μM), and/or PMA (10 nM) for 12 h in all experiments. Images were acquired with a 40× objective. ( A ) PCR analysis of TLR2. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.05 vs. SsnB. ( B ) PCR analysis of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.01 vs. SsnB. ( C ) Protein levels of Toll-like Receptor 2 (TLR2). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( D ) Protein levels of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( E ) Myeloid differentiation primary response protein (MyD88), phospho-ERK, and phospho-NF-kB were immunofluorescence stained in HCT-116 cells. ( F ) MyD88 fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001, vs. all other groups. **, p < 0.001, vs. control and DMSO groups. ( G ) Protein levels of MyD88. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( H ) Phospho-ERK fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.01, vs. all other groups. ( I ) Phospho-NF-kB fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( J ) Protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. control, DMSO, and SsnB. ( K ) Protein levels of interleukin 1Β (IL-1B). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. all other groups. ( L ) Protein levels of IL-6. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups.
    Toll Like Receptor Tlr Stimulus Independent Way, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/toll like receptor tlr stimulus independent way/product/Miltenyi Biotec
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    toll like receptor tlr stimulus independent way - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Evaluation of the TLR2-TLR4 signaling pathway in HCT-116 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO (1 μL/mL), SsnB (25 μM), and/or PMA (10 nM) for 12 h in all experiments. Images were acquired with a 40× objective. ( A ) PCR analysis of TLR2. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.05 vs. SsnB. ( B ) PCR analysis of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.01 vs. SsnB. ( C ) Protein levels of Toll-like Receptor 2 (TLR2). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( D ) Protein levels of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( E ) Myeloid differentiation primary response protein (MyD88), phospho-ERK, and phospho-NF-kB were immunofluorescence stained in HCT-116 cells. ( F ) MyD88 fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001, vs. all other groups. **, p < 0.001, vs. control and DMSO groups. ( G ) Protein levels of MyD88. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( H ) Phospho-ERK fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.01, vs. all other groups. ( I ) Phospho-NF-kB fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( J ) Protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. control, DMSO, and SsnB. ( K ) Protein levels of interleukin 1Β (IL-1B). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. all other groups. ( L ) Protein levels of IL-6. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups.

    Journal: Pharmaceuticals

    Article Title: Sparstolonin B Suppresses Proliferation and Modulates Toll-like Receptor Signaling and Inflammatory Pathways in Human Colorectal Cancer Cells

    doi: 10.3390/ph18030300

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Evaluation of the TLR2-TLR4 signaling pathway in HCT-116 cells. Cells were treated with DMSO (1 μL/mL), SsnB (25 μM), and/or PMA (10 nM) for 12 h in all experiments. Images were acquired with a 40× objective. ( A ) PCR analysis of TLR2. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.05 vs. SsnB. ( B ) PCR analysis of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 4 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal-Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined using Tukey’s test. *, p < 0.01 vs. SsnB. ( C ) Protein levels of Toll-like Receptor 2 (TLR2). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( D ) Protein levels of TLR4. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( E ) Myeloid differentiation primary response protein (MyD88), phospho-ERK, and phospho-NF-kB were immunofluorescence stained in HCT-116 cells. ( F ) MyD88 fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001, vs. all other groups. **, p < 0.001, vs. control and DMSO groups. ( G ) Protein levels of MyD88. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( H ) Phospho-ERK fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Values are the mean ± SD and n = 8. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.01, vs. all other groups. ( I ) Phospho-NF-kB fluorescence staining was quantified using ImageJ software. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups. ( J ) Protein levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test and the difference between the groups was determined with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. control, DMSO, and SsnB. ( K ) Protein levels of interleukin 1Β (IL-1B). Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.05 vs. all other groups. ( L ) Protein levels of IL-6. Data show the mean ± SD and n = 6 different measurements. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons. *, p < 0.001 vs. all other groups.

    Article Snippet: BT Lab, Shanghai, China), TLR4 (cat # E0346Hu.

    Techniques: Immunofluorescence, Staining, Fluorescence, Software, Control